Pre-Conference Event
Inside the Editorial Process: Writing, Reviewing, and Publishing for Trainees
Thursday October 15, 2026
1:00pm - 4:00pm
No registration fee, but pre-registration is required.
This session is offered in English only.
Presenters
Session Description
Objectives
Learning Outcomes
Workshop Format
Canadian Journal on Aging
CAG Student Connection
This pre-conference workshop is designed to provide trainees with a hands-on, practical introduction to the academic publishing and peer-review process. Its purpose is to help participants better understand how journals operate, what editors look for in a strong submission, and how to contribute meaningful, constructive feedback as reviewers. Rather than just hearing about how journals work, participants will actively practice the skills they need to publish and review with confidence.
The session will begin with a brief presentation by journal editors on the scope of the journal and editorial priorities, offering participants a clearer sense of how to prepare work for publication and avoid common pitfalls. The workshop will then move into an interactive group format, where trainees will work in small groups led by an editor mentor to review a sample article and discuss how they would respond as peer reviewers. Key topics will include identifying strengths and opportunities for improvement in a manuscript, organizing review comments effectively, and writing feedback that is professional, specific, and actionable. The session will conclude with a round table discussion, giving participants the opportunity to ask questions about publication, peer review, and the editorial decision-making process.
Introduce participants to the Canadian Journal on Aging’s scope, priorities, and editorial expectations.
Introduce participants to how editors evaluate fit, quality, contribution, and reviewer feedback when making publication decisions.
Provide trainees with guided practice in evaluating a sample manuscript as a peer reviewer.
Help participants learn how to structure clear, constructive, and professional review comments.
Create space for trainees to ask questions about the publication and peer-review process.
By the end of the workshop, participants will:
Describe the Canadian Journal on Aging’s scope and expectations and identify whether a manuscript is a good fit.
Recognize common editorial concerns that may lead to rejection, major revision, or minor revision.
Apply basic reviewer criteria when assessing a sample article and draft review comments that are respectful, specific, and actionable.
Formulate informed questions about manuscript submission, revision, and publication decisions.
Reflect on how editorial and peer-review feedback can strengthen scholarly writing.
The workshop uses an interactive, practice-oriented format that blends brief instructional input with collaborative learning. It is structured around didactic teaching, guided discussion, and hands-on application. The workshop begins with a short presentation from Canadian Journal on Aging editors on the journal’s scope and editorial expectations. Participants then move into small groups led by an editor mentor to review a sample manuscript and discuss how they would respond as peer reviewers. Within the groups, trainees compare interpretations, identify strengths and opportunities for improvement in the article, and practice formulating constructive review comments. The session ends with a round table discussion where trainees can ask questions about peer review, submission, and publication processes.
